Gene,
You howl into the wind when you try to argue that the US Congress has any business holding hearings on the integrity of baseball (or any other sport). Would Congress hold hearings to determine if it was unfair/illegal/whatever for Hollywood actresses to get boob jobs to increase their ability to get roles/attract paparazzi? Sports is no more noble than playing cello for the symphony, writing poetry for an online zine or digging a ditch for the electric company. Only fools think sports are supposed to provide anybody with hero figures up to whom we normal blokes look. They're entertainers; they might as well be singing and dancing.
That sports columnists can't understand this while opining about the state of government is particularly vexing, since you clearly have issues understanding what's really going on in the world/country.
To wit:
This particular Congress was essentially installed in November of 2006 to end the war in Iraq.
How's that goin'?
This statement is a lie, you know it is a lie, yet you pretend it is the truth because it's convenient in your anti-America position that when America is involved in a war, America must naturally be wrong. The Democrats did not run campaigns in 2006 against the war in Iraq and if you can't make yourself understand that, maybe you can spend some time googling or youtubeing up some actual campaign ads that had Democrats running as more fiscally conservative than Republicans (and less "corrupt", btw). How's
that goin'?
But what kind of drugs are you taking when you write this idiotic boilerplate:
Having failed spectacularly at its principal purpose, I don't like its chances on health care, the looming recession, immigration reform, energy policy, the environment, veterans affairs, Internet safety, education, national security, and the one billion other issues correctly deemed more important than the preservation of Roger Clemens' image, such as it is.
Now certainly, just because Congress is spectacularly impotent, that doesn't mean it should ignore its larger mission and instead throw rocks at the Rocket in the public square. But as I've pointed out previously in this context, any time you can get 20 or 30 Congressmen and Congresswomen to sit in one room for four or five hours, that's four or five hours they're not out there canoodling with big pharma, the gun lobby, the trial lawyers and the hundreds of other lobbyists who poison the legislative process.
So count your blessings.
Sheesh, you have some issues understanding the way the world/government really works. Big pharma saves lives by inventing new drugs that cure diseases. The gun lobby makes sure people can protect themselves against illegally armed criminals. The trial lawyers? The Democrats are in bed with the trial lawyers, Gene, so according to your belief system, that's a good thing. Do lobbyists "poison" the legislative process or do they give vital information to Congressmen who might otherwise go unaware of an issue? I dunno. I guess it depends on the lobby.
Of course, if you're going to stray of the sports reservation to inform your readership about the ills of government, then maybe you owe us a glimpse into how you think Congress should solve "health care, the looming recession, immigration reform, energy policy, the environment, veterans affairs, Internet safety, education, [and] national security," since you clearly think there are problems that need to be solved in those areas. I mean, if you think Congress should be investigating baseball players about their use of steroids and such, well, then you should surely be in favor of a much more intrusive federal government in all areas of life.
Maybe the feds should be allowed to determine what you can put in your body? Would you like that?