A dead newspaper editor pondered the demise of the newspaper industry in an
article over at Poynter Online and traces the death back to 1949. He's right in noting that most newspapers are boring, dull, monolithic and lazily reported. There's nothing pull-quotey in the article, and the writer misses the largest, hugest, biggest problem with newspapers and why they are, suddenly, epically, going out of business: leftist bias.
How he misses that and lays the blame at the feet of three innocuous fellows is a mystery to me, because once the blogosphere came along and began exposing the socialist/fascist/leftist agenda driving the mainstream media, people began not buying the product. Oddly, this caused most media outlets to double-down on the leftism, which only sped them more quickly to the grave as the doubters in the so-called middle began to realize that newspapers weren't fair, honest and neutral arbiters of information with multiple layers of fact-checking, but were, in fact, hard-wired into the extreme left and totally intent on creating an alternate reality in the minds of readers that would cause them to want to vote for Democrats.
I'm guessing the writer was a Democratic Party leftist, and like most such people, totally incapable of self-analysis or inquisitive thought about his own ideological beliefs.